23 June 2010
The squeeze on society
Anna Coote
Head of Social Policy
The government wants to build a ‘Big Society’ at the same time as a imposing a very big squeeze on spending for public services. This will not work unless spending is focused more sharply on preventing needs arising or intensifying ,and on supporting individuals and groups so that they can do more to help themselves and each other.
The danger is that the first victims of the squeeze will be the very things that are essential for preventing harm, improving well-being and encouraging self-help and mutual aid. Examples include healthy and appetising school meals, child care services, open access to swimming and other sports, community meeting places, training and other resources for local groups, ‘social prescribing’ by GPs, out of school activities for young people, programmes to keep older people active and socially connected, more and better green spaces in urban areas, and much more. Cuts in these areas will only push up demand for services in the longer run.
Read more about nef‘s take on the Big Society; why we think prevantative public services are valuable, especially for children; how welfare can be transformed to meet the economic and climate crises; and how co-production can improve the experience of service users and public servants.
Connect with us
Recent blog posts
-
If Iain Duncan Smith really cares about prevention he should focus on economic inequality
14 March 2012
-
Ten Big Questions about the Open Public Services White Paper
14 July 2011
-
Breaking the silence of civil society
16 May 2011
-
The Big Society and the struggle for the soul of the voluntary sector
18 April 2011
-
Hard work and the Big Society
11 January 2011
-
A shorter working week would benefit society
3 August 2010
-
Cameron's Big Society will leave the poor and powerless behind
19 July 2010
-
The squeeze on society
23 June 2010
-
21 hours: a new norm for the working week?
15 February 2010
-
A revolutionary moment
10 February 2009









