23 August 2010
Should policymakers care about well-being?
Juliet Michaelson
Senior Researcher, centre for well-being

Although I would probably, if asked, describe my work at nef as being part of the ‘battle of ideas’, it’s not all that often that I would use the phrase to describe a day in the office. But last week I found myself truly in the thick of it, subjecting my ideas about well-being research to the scrutiny of a conversation with a dedicated opponent. I went head-to-head in an Intelligence Squared podcast debate with Paul Ormerod, author of an Institute of Economic Affairs report which argued that well-being data should have no role in policy making.
I’m happy to report that overall it was a pretty enjoyable experience. I remained unconvinced by Paul’s arguments that using well-being data in policy making, rather than providing an important source of additional information on the welfare of citizens, would in fact be the road to tyranny at the hands of faceless technocrats. But he was a lively sparring partner in a conversation that I hope should prove interesting listening. Judge for yourself by listening to the podcast...
Connect with us
Recent blog posts
-
Video: Gross Domestic Happiness
6 December 2011
-
Local government and well-being revisited
25 November 2011
-
Sir Gus and the well-being revolution
26 July 2011
-
Southern Cross have been following the wrong star
1 June 2011
-
Bringing well-being evidence into local decision-making
12 May 2011
-
Cameron’s well-being index could help transform lives for the better
26 November 2010
-
Putting well-being at the heart of local places
24 November 2010
-
The week well-being economics went mainstream?
1 October 2010
-
Should policymakers care about well-being?
23 August 2010
-
Real-time happiness data launched for the UK
10 August 2010









