13 December 2010

Tame the Vampire Squid and take back our banks

Andy Wimbush

Ruth Potts
Campaign Co-ordinator, The Great Transition

If banks operated like a public service, we wouldn't need a Big Society bank: it's time to take back our banks.

As the UK government back-tracks over bank reform, there are signs that the government has misjudged the public mood. Student protests have targeted bank branches as well as parliament, and while its impact remains to be seen, the Cantona-inspired BankRun2010 has attracted supporters in 15 countries around the world, the most significant in the UK and France. A new campaign animation, inspired by Rolling Stone Journalist Matt Taibbi’s description of Goldman Sachs as a vampire squid “wrapped around the face of humanity”, released this week and supported by groups from 38 Degrees to Compass, ResPublica, PLATFORM, Positive Money and the World Development Movement is designed to up the ante on bank reform.

Evidence that emerged in the Financial Times yesterday would seem to indicate that two years after the financial crisis that sent shockwaves through the global financial system, Chancellor George Osborne is preparing to “normalize relations between government and the city” leaving banking regulation exactly as it was when the crisis hit. This is the same George Osborne, who, when presenting the Government’s emergency budget just six months ago, stated:

“In putting in order the nation’s finances, we must remember that this was a crisis that started in the banking sector. The failures of the banks imposed a huge cost on the rest of society.”

It is said that a week is a long time in politics. With regard to government resolve to reform the banking sector, a few weeks is enough time for a total volte-face.

The rumour, reported in the FT, is that a deal is being struck in which bankers exercise a ‘degree’ of restraint over bonuses, promise funding to UK businesses (a promise they’ve previously broken time and time again according to small business groups) and provide funding for the ‘Big Society Bank’ any further talk of reform will be kicked into the long grass.

This “normalization” of relations with the city strikes a particularly odd note when establishment figures such as Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King are becoming increasingly vocal about the need for fundamental reform of the financial system. He is emphatic that some of the much lauded attempts to reform banks are inadequate:

"If [Basel III, the latest international agreement on banking rules] is a giant leap for the regulators of the world, it is only a small step for mankind. Basel III on its own will not prevent another crisis."

King is also beginning to ask very fundamental questions about how banking operates as this extract from a recent speech demonstrates:

“What we cannot countenance is a continuation of the system in which bank executives trade and take risks on their own account, and yet those who finance them are protected from loss by the implicit taxpayer guarantees…  Of all the many ways of organising banking, the worst is the one we have today.”

And, newly revealed data from the Federal Reserve shows just how close to global financial meltdown we came. Investment Bank Goldman Sachs has frequently insisted it could have survived without taxpayer support.  Fed data, released last week, tells a different story. At the height of the crisis, Goldman Sachs tapped one source of emergency funding 84 times borrowing almost $600 billion just to stay afloat.

Even with the promised ‘restraint’, it is likely that UK banks are preparing for another round of staggering bonuses, oblivious to the debts they bear to society. The banks claim that these payouts are necessary for attracting the best staff. But is that really true? Psychologists at MIT found that when students were set a task that required even the most basic cognitive skill, a larger reward actually reduced performance. And there's living proof that bonuses aren't necessary for success. Sweden has a major bank, Svenska Handelsbanken, which doesn't pay any bonuses at all.

If banks operated in public interest, there would be no need for a ‘Big Society Bank. It is time to take back our banks….

Share this:

Comments

14 Dec 2010 at 11:10

Kevin Mayes

Of course the banks wield a very big stick when it comes to the damage they could do to a nation or government that threatens their hegemony. It seems unlikely, but we may hope the government are playing a bluff with the banks in order to buy time to organise a "coup de grace" against the vampires, placing them under administration, reforming accounts strictly into safe storage accounts for those who seek a safe home for their money, investment accounts for those that can afford to take a risk in order to seek a return on their capital and to "mark to market value" those toxic "assets", derivatives etc that the bankers have invented to inflate the apparent worth of their business and so justify their huge bonuses. The banks are certain to be as obstructive as possible in this matter. The political elite must realise that the unfettered growth of the financial sector in the last thirty years or so at the expense of the real economy has made the economy highly unstable, and that the social trauma of the inevitable deflation that must follow as night follows day will send the world into chaos and tyrany. The big question is- who will be brave enough to take the quantum leap?

21 Dec 2010 at 09:15

Ghazal

Wow, this animation is really powerful. It would be a great resource for primary schools, to let children know what's happening in the real world.

17 Jan 2011 at 14:03

Anonymous

A "quantum leap" is a very small leap. It does not mean "a large change".

26 Jan 2011 at 15:36

Bryn

We know that the banks are uniquely vulnerable to public withdrawal of their accounts. Is it not time for a publicity campaign to get 100,000 people to pledge that if bonuses are unacceptably high in their bank, they will withdraw their account and move to a responsible bank on, say 1st May. Fear of such a dynamic could influence other account holders to consider moving their accounts; publicity about the biggest bonuses could help people to know where to move from and to; and pretty soon some more responsible practices would set in. And if it worked for bank bonuses, we could then suggest that we withdraw our accounts from banks that invest in companies that make, for example, the uranium weapons responsible for so many birth defects in Fallujah.