Urgent reforms to re-localise Britain are under threat because politicians don't understand localism. Instead, argues David Boyle, localism is about how to make things work, and how to escape from the centralisation that is making Britain seize up. He ends the pamphlet with a call for a debate which is less about committee meetings and more about life.
June 10, 2009 // Written by:
Urgent reforms to re-localise Britain - that all three main political parties have committed to- are under threat because politicians don't understand localism. In this nef pamphlet, David Boyle argues that unless the debate about localism is broadened, the narrow Westminster understanding of the issue will frustrate the re-locatlisation which is needed if we are to get Britain working again.
"Politicians have narrowed the localism debate because they only have the language of centralisation with which to discuss it," says Boyle, "The result is that they only ever discuss politicians' versions of localism - government functions, elections and local committees."
Political understanding of localisation has impoverished the debate, and as a result, local economies and communities are losing out. Instead, localism is about how to make things work, and how to escape from the centralisation that is making Britain seize up.
Boyle ends the pamphlet with a call for a debate which is less about committee meetings and more about life, and must include:
- How to give power and initiative back to front line public service staff.
- How to hand more responsibility to service users for delivering broader services, to make real change possible.
- How to make public services more human scale.
- How to localise economic power as well as political power.
nef publications are licensed under a Creative Commons license. You are free to quote, copy and share this publication, as long as you attribute it to nef and do not use it for commerical purposes. Please contact us if you are interested in translating a nef publication.